Online agenda available at http://hsr.ca.gov/Board/monthly_brdmt…
- Consider Approving the Board Meeting Minutes from the April 12,
2016 Meeting
- Consider Adopting the 2016 Business Plan
- Presentation on the San Jose Station Area Intermodal Plan
- Update on the San Francisco to San Jose Project Section
- Update on the San Jose to Merced Project Section
- Update on the Merced to Sacramento Project Section
- Closed Session Pertaining to Litigation
The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to
Government Code section 11126(e)(2)(A) to confer with counsel
with regard to the following litigation:
Kings County; Kings County Farm Bureau; California
Citizens for High-Speed Rail Accountability; Community
Coalition on High-Speed Rail; California Rail Foundation;
TRANSDEF v. Surface Transportation Board; CHSRA
Intervenor (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit Case No. 15-71780)
County of Kings v. California High-Speed Rail Authority;
(Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001861)
County of Kern v. California High-Speed Rail Authority;
(Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001863)
First Free Baptist Church of Bakersfield v. California HighSpeed
Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No.
34-2014-80001864)
Dignity Health v. California High-Speed Rail Authority;
(Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001865)
City of Shafter v. California High-Speed Rail Authority;
(Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001908)
TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS DEFENSE AND
EDUCATION FUND v. California Air Resources Board and
CHSRA as a real party in interest; (Fresno Superior Court
Case No. 14CECG01788)
The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to
Government Code section 11126(e)(2)(B)(i);11126 (a)(1).
* “A” denotes an “Action” item; “I” denotes an “Information” item; “C” denotes “consent”
item.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
(c)2016 CHSRA | SCVTV
Waste of money